Ecole d'ingénieur et centre de recherche en Sciences du numérique

Hard fairness versus proportional fairness in wireless communications: the single-cell case

Caire, Giuseppe;Müller, Ralph;Knopp, Raymond

IEEE Transactions on information theory, Volume 53, Issue 4, April 2007

We consider a wireless communication system formed by a single cell with one base station and $K$ user terminals. User channels are characterized by frequency-selective fading due to small-scale effects, modeled as a set of $M$ parallel block-fading channels, and a frequency-flat distance-dependent path loss. We compare delay-limited systems with variable-rate systems under fairness constraints, in terms of the achieved system spectral efficiency ${ssr C}$ (bit/s/Hz) versus $E_b/N_0$. The considered delay-limited systems impose hard-fairness: every user transmits at its desired rate on all blocks, independently of its fading conditions. The variable-rate system imposes proportional fairness via the popular Proportional Fair Scheduling (PFS) algorithm, currently implemented in 3G wireless for data (delay-tolerant) applications. We find simple iterative resource allocation algorithms that converge to the optimal delay-limited throughput for orthogonal (frequency-division multiple access (FDMA)/time-division multiple access (TDMA)) and optimal (superposition/interference cancellation) signaling. In the limit of large $K$ and finite $M$ we find closed-form expressions for ${ssr C}$ as a function of $E_b/N_0$. We show that in this limit, the optimal allocation policy consists of letting each user transmit on its best subchannel only. Also, we find a simple closed-form expression for the throughput of PFS in a cellular environment, that holds for any $K$ and $M$. Finally, we obtain closed-form expressions for ${ssr C}$ versus $E_b/N_0$ in the low and high spectral efficiency regimes. The conclusions of our analysis in terms of system design guidelines are as follows: a) if hard fairness is a requirement, orthogonal access incurs a large throughput penalty with respect to the optimal (superposition coding) strategy, especially in the regime of high spectral efficiency; b) for high spectral efficiency, PFS does not provide any significant gain and may even perform- worse than the optimal delay-limited system, de

Document Doi Bibtex

Titre:Hard fairness versus proportional fairness in wireless communications: the single-cell case
Département:Systèmes de Communication
Eurecom ref:2214
Copyright: © 2007 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.
Bibtex: @article{EURECOM+2214, doi = {}, year = {2007}, month = {04}, title = {{H}ard fairness versus proportional fairness in wireless communications: the single-cell case}, author = {{C}aire, {G}iuseppe and {M}{\"u}ller, {R}alph and {K}nopp, {R}aymond}, journal = {{IEEE} {T}ransactions on information theory, {V}olume 53, {I}ssue 4, {A}pril 2007}, url = {} }
Voir aussi: